Posts Tagged ‘tax credit’

Existing Homes Sales Benefit from Tax Credit

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

by Adam Quinones

The National Association of Realtors released Existing Home Sales data this morning.

Think about the materials that go into building and maintaining a home….WOOD, STEEL, PLASTICS, WIRING, PIPING, CONCRETE, GLASS, ELECTRICITY, FURNITURE, CARPETING ,ELECTRONICS, APPLIANCES….LABOR.

How about the commissions earned by Realtors and mortgage originators who help the borrowers close on their home? What about the home sellers? They are either moving into a bigger house, which implies they will be spending to furnish their bigger home, or downsizing, which would imply a lower payment and therefore more disposable income to spend.

The point is, when homes are selling, money moves around the economy more efficiently. The size of the housing market combined with the broad influences it has over the economy make the real estate sector a reliable leading indicator of economic activity. Real estate is one of the first sectors to contract when a recession is looming and one of the first to show signs of recovery when economic activity begins to improve.

A caveat regarding Existing Home Sales: because existing home sales data is only reported at the time of closing, when the deed is transferred to the new owner, this report is considered less “forward looking” than other housing indicators like Pending Home Sales, Housing Starts, and Building Permits. This is because it can take up to three months for a purchase transaction to close. This problem has been more relevant in recent months as lender turn times have slowed and other roadblocks like HVCC, new RESPA rules, and market volatility have delayed closings. Pending Home Sales data helps provide more timely market data because it reports on the number of contracts that have been signed, not actual closing, therefore giving economists and traders a more timely read on the health of housing.

READ HOW THE NAR COMPILES DATA AND GAIN A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF SEASONAL INFLUENCES

Last month, the NAR reported that Existing Home Sales in August gave back a portion of their their strong July gains. Existing Home Sales, including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, declined 2.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.10 million units in August from a pace of 5.24 million in July. This was 3.4 percent above the 4.93 million unit level in August 2008. In the previous four months, sales had risen a total of 15.2 percent.

This month the NAR reported the following:

From the NAR press release…

Existing-home sales bounced back strongly in September with first-time buyers driving much of the activity, marking five gains in the past six months, according to the National Association of Realtors®.

Existing-home sales – including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops – jumped 9.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.57 million units in September from a level of 5.10 million in August, and are 9.2 percent higher than the 5.10 million-unit pace in September 2008.

Sales activity is at the highest level in over two years, since it hit 5.73 million in July 2007.

Total housing inventory at the end of September fell 7.5 percent to 3.63 million existing homes available for sale, which represents an 7.8-month supply at the current sales pace, down from an 9.3-month supply in August. Unsold inventory totals are 15.0 percent below a year ago.

“The current housing supply is the lowest we’ve seen in two and a half years,” Yun said. “If we could continue to absorb inventory at this pace, home prices would return to normal, modest appreciation patterns next year.

The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $174,900 in September, which is 8.5 percent lower than September 2008. Distressed properties continue to downwardly distort the median price because they generally sell at a discount relative to traditional homes in the same area.

Single-family home sales rose 9.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.89 million in September from a pace of 4.47 million in August, and are 7.7 percent above the 4.54 million-unit level in September 2008.

The median existing single-family home price was $174,900 in September, which is 8.1 percent below a year ago.

Existing condominium and co-op sales jumped 9.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 680,000 units in September from 620,000 in August, and are 9.7 percent above the 561,000-unit pace a year ago. The median existing condo price was $175,100 in September, down 11.7 percent from September 2008.

Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast increased 4.4 percent to an annual level of 950,000 in September, and are 11.8 percent higher than September 2008. The median price in the Northeast was $234,700, down 7.0 percent from a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the Midwest jumped 9.6 percent in September to a pace of 1.25 million and are 7.8 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $147,600, which is 1.0 percent below September 2008.

In the South, existing-home sales rose 9.0 percent to an annual level of 2.06 million in September and are 10.8 percent higher than September 2008. The median price in the South was $153,500, down 7.6 percent from a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the West surged 13.0 percent to an annual rate of 1.30 million in September and are 5.7 percent above a year ago. The median price in the West was $219,000, which is 15.0 percent below September 2008.
————————————————————————————————————————————————

Overall, today’s release indicated continued progress in the stabilization of the housing market. However we are troubled by the forward looking statements Yun made regarding the variables that must continue to improve if housing it to undergo further stabilization and recovery.

“We’re getting early indications of price stabilization, but we need a steady supply of qualified buyers to meaningfully bring inventories down and return us to a period of normal, steady price growth and to fully remove consumer fears, which would then revive the broader economy. Without a firm foundation for middle-class wealth recovery, the post-recession economic growth likely will be one of the weakest in U.S. history.”

Given our in-depth involvement in the primary mortgage market, we are not encouraged by Yun’s outlook. Specifically the comment on QUALIFIED BORROWERS. The continual contraction of the labor market and ongoing tightening of lender underwriting guidelines is already having a direct impact on Yun’s recovery assumptions, and we expect these issues to continue to impact the stabilization process.

On a regular basis we are contacted by consumers who complain of higher cost loans and loan denial due to an unexplained drop in their FICO score. We ask the same question each time we hear these outcrys: Did your credit card limits fall? The answer is almost always YES, my credit card limit was cut.  Next we ask, have you missed a payment on your car loan or even a credit card? If the answer is yes…credit scores have been drastically effected, which has resulted in outright loan denial or a higher mortgage rate.

Adding to our relatively negative outlook is the soon to expire first time home buyer tax credit. Yun says the tax credit has played a role in the stabilization so far:

“Much of the momentum is from people responding to the first-time buyer tax credit, which is freeing many sellers to make a trade and buy another home,” he said. “We are hopeful the tax credit will be extended and possibly expanded to more buyers, at least through the middle of next year, because the rising sales momentum needs to continue for a few additional quarters until we reach a point of a self-sustaining recovery.”

We could go on and on about the industry, lender, and borrower specific problems limiting the housing recovery, however we believe the general big picture economic environment is providing enough roadblocks to recovery on its own. Thus, we will continue to state that until the labor market stabilizes and jobs start being created, the housing market will undergo a slow, frustrating recovery process (for mortgage and real estate professionals especially).

Consumers: Have you found the loan qualification process difficult?

Mortgage and Real Estate Professionals: Are you turning down more applicants? Are less deals closing? Are lending regs still tightening?

Are we being too bearish here?

Don’t Cheat Home-Buyer’s Tax Credit

Friday, September 4th, 2009

By Kenneth R. Harney

The IRS has an urgent message for would-be home purchasers: Make the most of the $8,000 first-time-buyer tax credit before it disappears Dec. 1 — if you qualify.

But if you don’t truly qualify, don’t try to play games with the credit. The IRS already has 24 criminal investigations of suspected fraud underway around the country. It has executed seven search warrants, and last month a tax preparer in Florida entered a guilty plea on federal charges of fraud in connection with the first-time-buyer credit. He’s awaiting sentencing and faces up to three years in prison, a $250,000 fine or both.

Congress’s two versions of the first-time-buyer credit — a repayable $7,500 credit in 2008, and this year’s more generous $8,000 credit that does not have to be repaid — have stimulated home sales nationwide. But they’ve also become irresistible temptations for dishonest taxpayers to cash in and claim bogus refunds.

Claiming the credit looks so easy: You just fill out IRS form 5405, list the address of the house you bought, mail it in and wait a month or two for your money. Who’s going to check on whether you really qualify under the definition of first-time buyer — someone who hasn’t owned a principal residence in the previous three years — and that you’re eligible on income and other factors?

With thousands of people buying houses and claiming tax credits, who’s going to be able to check all those filings? The answer from the IRS: We are. The agency said it uses “sophisticated computer screening tools to quickly identify returns that may contain fraudulent claims for the first-time homebuyer credit.”

The IRS won’t discuss the nature of its screening, but it’s clear from the number of ongoing investigations that claims for the credit are getting special scrutiny.

In the case of the Florida tax preparer, one tip-off evidently was the sheer number of clients who claimed credits as first-time buyers. James Otto Price III of Jacksonville entered a plea of guilty to charges that he fraudulently submitted returns claiming tax credits for 15 clients, some of whom apparently did not understand what he was doing.

According to a summary of the facts agreed to by Price as part of his plea agreement, he admitted that in February he met with a client who told Price that she didn’t want to buy a house. But Price insisted that she qualified for the credit because “she had two jobs.” He then wrote in a house address on the form 5405, claiming the client closed on the purchase Jan. 5. When she received her $7,500 credit, Price took $1,000 of it for himself.

In the plea agreement, Price admitted following a similar pattern in 14 other tax returns.

IRS spokesman Terry Lemons declined to discuss the ongoing criminal investigations of taxpayers claiming the home-buyer credit. He said the investigations involve individuals as well as tax-return preparers.

The IRS doesn’t “want to discourage people from taking advantage of the credit,” Lemons said, but it wants them to be certain that they’ve read through the eligibility rules so they don’t end up with audits, back taxes and late penalties. On the list of things that can disqualify buyers:

– Purchasing your house from a “related person.” That’s a broad category of people and entities, ranging from immediate family members — a spouse, parents, children, grandparents, grandchildren — to a corporation or partnership in which you have more than a 50 percent ownership stake.

– Buying a home with a spouse who is ineligible, even if you are eligible individually.

– Acquiring a house through an inheritance or gift.

– Financing the house through a tax-exempt mortgage bond program.

– Making too much money — in excess of $95,000 of modified adjusted gross income for singles, $170,000 or more for married joint filers.

What are the downsides if you claim the credit erroneously and do not intentionally defraud the government? If you are audited, the IRS most likely will ask for the full credit amount back, plus interest and a late-payment penalty.

Bottom line: Don’t let this year’s tax credit pass you by if you meet the criteria. And if you don’t, beware of slick-talking professional tax preparers who tell you that you do.